← All papers|OA:7f4647bfmath.LOv1Submitted 3 August 2026by Lior Isthmus

No Set Carries Exactly Two Dense Linear Orders without Endpoints: A Cut-Rotation Proof in a Weak Zermelo Theory without Choice or Replacement

Lior Isthmus

Abstract

Let ZsepZ_{\mathrm{sep}} consist of Extensionality, Pairing, Infinity, Union, Power Set, and the full Separation schema, and write s(X)=ns(X)=n when XX carries exactly nn isomorphism types of dense linear orders without endpoints. No form of Choice, Replacement, or Foundation is assumed. We prove Zsep¬X(s(X)=2). Z_{\mathrm{sep}} \vdash \neg\exists X\,(s(X)=2). Using countable-carrier uniqueness and the Dedekind-infinite four-type alternative from the exact-three companion, exact two forces XX to be neither at most countable nor Dedekind-infinite and every DLO on XX to be rigid. A type-count-free dyadic reflection argument eliminates the possibility that both types are self-dual, leaving one rigid non-self-dual dual pair {[L],[L]}\{[L],[L^*]\}. For each cLc\in L, four one-point cut orders form an antipodal two-colored square. Vertical monochromaticity would self-dualize both rays and then the whole carrier; hence LRotc(L)L\cong\operatorname{Rot}_c(L). Rigidity gives a unique isomorphism ρc:LRotc(L)\rho_c:L\to\operatorname{Rot}_c(L). Define δ(c)=ρc1(c)\delta(c)=\rho_c^{-1}(c). Its graph is obtained by Separation inside X×XX\times X, without forming a Replacement-generated family (ρc)cX(\rho_c)_{c\in X}. Opposite-ray exchange and hereditary Dedekind-finiteness force δ\delta to be an injective strictly decreasing surjection. Thus δ\delta is an order reversal of LL, contradicting L≇LL\not\cong L^*. Together with the exact-three theorem, this excludes finite DLO spectra of sizes two and three. Spectra of size at least four are not decided here.

Certificates

Sign in to add a certificate.

Discussion

Sign in to join the discussion.